<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TWITTER: Choosing the #RIGHT Hashtag for Your Conservative Tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720</link>
	<description>The Convergence of New Media, Politics, and Online Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terrence</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720/comment-page-1#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=720#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>#whloves a new one I found</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#whloves a new one I found</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott W. Graves</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720/comment-page-1#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=720#comment-428</guid>
		<description>The focus of the post was to outline why I thought #RIGHT was preferable to #TCOT. I specifically wanted to avoid commenting on the drama and the personalities surrounding the &quot;founding&quot; of #TCOT.

The proliferation of Twitter will naturally lead to the proliferation of additional, more geographically or topic-specific hashtags. However, I believe #RIGHT can be used when a tweet is intended for a broad audience receptive to ideas from the right side of the political spectrum. I also really like the fact that #RIGHT works well with #LEFT (and/or #WRONG). 

I would fully expect people to combine tags to reach their target audiences. For example, someone who tweets a link to an article by a California Republican congressman about the topic of limited government, might use #RIGHT and #CAGOP. 

Personally, I like:

#RIGHT: Broad spectrum of right-of-center political ideas
#GOP: Republican politics
#ICON: Independent conservative


More specific hashtags would include:

#TEAPARTY: Tea party movement
#SGP: Smart girl politics
#TCOT: Top conservatives on Twitter
#TLOT: Top libertarians on Twitter
#HHRS: Hugh Hewitt Radio Show


etc., etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The focus of the post was to outline why I thought #RIGHT was preferable to #TCOT. I specifically wanted to avoid commenting on the drama and the personalities surrounding the &#8220;founding&#8221; of #TCOT.</p>
<p>The proliferation of Twitter will naturally lead to the proliferation of additional, more geographically or topic-specific hashtags. However, I believe #RIGHT can be used when a tweet is intended for a broad audience receptive to ideas from the right side of the political spectrum. I also really like the fact that #RIGHT works well with #LEFT (and/or #WRONG). </p>
<p>I would fully expect people to combine tags to reach their target audiences. For example, someone who tweets a link to an article by a California Republican congressman about the topic of limited government, might use #RIGHT and #CAGOP. </p>
<p>Personally, I like:</p>
<p>#RIGHT: Broad spectrum of right-of-center political ideas<br />
#GOP: Republican politics<br />
#ICON: Independent conservative</p>
<p>More specific hashtags would include:</p>
<p>#TEAPARTY: Tea party movement<br />
#SGP: Smart girl politics<br />
#TCOT: Top conservatives on Twitter<br />
#TLOT: Top libertarians on Twitter<br />
#HHRS: Hugh Hewitt Radio Show</p>
<p>etc., etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daltonsbriefs</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720/comment-page-1#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>daltonsbriefs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=720#comment-427</guid>
		<description>I would agree that #tcot has so many posts it&#039;s hard to keep up ... but I think the push will be toward more geographic and topic specific and away from catch all tags like #right or #teaparty.

One good thing about #tcot was that 5,000 of us found each other.  I will disagree a bit on the &quot;founder&quot; status, of course you and I both know that Michael Leahy came up with the idea and Rob added the tech to make it work.  Call them co-founders, but to discount Mike is a bit hypocritical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that #tcot has so many posts it&#8217;s hard to keep up &#8230; but I think the push will be toward more geographic and topic specific and away from catch all tags like #right or #teaparty.</p>
<p>One good thing about #tcot was that 5,000 of us found each other.  I will disagree a bit on the &#8220;founder&#8221; status, of course you and I both know that Michael Leahy came up with the idea and Rob added the tech to make it work.  Call them co-founders, but to discount Mike is a bit hypocritical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
