<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott W. Graves &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/tag/twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottgraves.com</link>
	<description>The Convergence of New Media, Politics, and Online Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social Media: Sidelined by Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/917</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/917#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday I sat down to my computer with my morning cup of coffee and discovered the nice folks at Twitter had decided to give me a timeout. My account had been temporarily suspended for reasons unknown. As I contemplated the possibility of being cut off from my friends and my conduit for news and information, I was forced to think how the tools of social media impact my life and my organization.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Lessons Learned from a Temporary Twitter Account Suspension</h2>
<p>Attending a recent 300 guest D.C. dinner party, I expected to see about twenty personal friends and another two dozen familiar faces who were media pundits and political figures. I didn’t plan to stay long; chat it up with friends and introduce myself to some of the celebs. So much for my plans.</p>
<p>I entered the room and felt like I already knew everybody… and oddly enough, I felt like they knew me. It was amazing! The people and faces from my social networks had come to life!</p>
<p>To “LibertyMatt” I asked about his coaching duties for his son’s soccer team. I talked to “MStevens912” about her new job and shared grad school stories with “Jason912”. These were people who I had never met and yet felt like they were old friends. Conversations flowed. We just picked up where we had last left them… on Twitter and Facebook!</p>
<p>Fast forward to last week. On Wednesday I sat down to my computer with my morning cup of coffee and discovered the nice folks at Twitter had decided to give me a timeout. My account had been temporarily suspended for reasons unknown. As I contemplated the possibility of being cut off from my friends and my conduit for news and information, I was forced to think how the tools of social media impact my life and my organization.</p>
<p>My timeout lasted 48 stressful hours, during which I identified three important lessons about my growing dependency on social media tools. Consider these lessons as you further integrate these same tools into your organization’s communications strategy.</p>
<p><strong>1. Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube have become an integral part of how I grow my brand, share ideas, and communicate with the world.</strong><br />
Without those tools, I feel completely isolated. With little or no cost, I can reach out to tens of thousands of potential customers and collaborate with hundreds of like-minded vendors and activists. Leveraging these tools is both powerful and cost effective marketing.</p>
<p><strong>2. Do not take social networking sites and communities for granted.</strong><br />
You are at their mercy. Without warning they can unplug you and your organization from your community. Unlike paid services like your cable provider or wireless carrier, social networking sites are free. And what they giveth, they can also take away. Your problems will get solved on their time, not yours. Keep this in mind as you plan your mission critical communications efforts.</p>
<p><strong>3. Don’t put all of your social media eggs in one basket.</strong><br />
I mention Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube because these are the tools I use. But these are not the only tools; they just happen to be new Big Three. Consider other tools and invest the time to develop a robust presence within those communities. A healthy diversification will prevent the whims of one social network from crippling your ability to communicate with the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/917/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIDEO: Social Media Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/838</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/838#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Media & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is social media a fad? Or is it the biggest shift since the Industrial Revolution? Welcome to the World of Socialnomics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="300" height="182"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sIFYPQjYhv8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sIFYPQjYhv8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="300" height="182"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/838/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if the Founding Fathers had used Twitter to Pen the Bill of Rights?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/737</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/737#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Political Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The beauty of some of our nation's founding documents is a relative brevity that has allowed the ideas to endure the test of time. Of course, had the Founding Fathers had Twitter accounts, and been limited to only 140 characters per tweet, perhaps our Bill of Rights would have looked very different. Imagine @JamesMadison tweeting...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, legislation is so long and convoluted, nobody except the special interests bother to read the very laws that govern our lives. Case in point, this year&#8217;s stimulus bill clocked in at 1,588 pages. It was so long in fact, not a single member of the House or Senate could credibly claim to have read the bill when it came time to cast a vote. Another example is the European Constitution which weighs in at 341 pages. Not bad compared to the stimulus bill, but still extraordinarily long compared to the Bill of Rights penned by James Madison.</p>
<p>The beauty of some of our nation&#8217;s founding documents is a relative brevity that has allowed the ideas to endure the test of time. Of course, had the Founding Fathers had Twitter accounts, and been limited to only 140 characters per tweet, perhaps our Bill of Rights would have looked very different.</p>
<p><strong>Imagine @JamesMadison tweeting @ThomasJefferson&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Penned BofR. Ref&#8217;d VA Dec of Rights &amp; Magna Carta. Adams &amp; Hancock onboard. Hamilton &amp; P. Henry pissed. LOL. Ratify ASAP.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>Preamble</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Constitution intended to: better union, establish justice, insure tranquility, common defense, promote general welfare, &amp; secure liberty.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>1st Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Congress shall make no law for or against religion; or abridging freedom of speech, press, assembly, or petitioning gov&#8217;t with grievances.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>2nd Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;A well regulated Militia, necessary 4 the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>3rd Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;No soilder shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house w/o consent of owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner prescribed by law.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>4th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;One&#8217;s body, home, papers, &amp; effects secure against search &amp; seizure. Warrants can be issued under oath and with probable cause.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>5th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Trials 4 capital crimes req. indictment by Grand Jury. No 2X jeopardy. Can&#8217;t testify against self. Due process. No confiscation w/o comp.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>6th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Accused shall have speedy &amp; public trial w/ impartial jury, the assistance of counsel, and ability to confront and provide witnesses.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>7th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;In lawsuits &gt;$20, preserve right of trial by jury &amp; no fact tried by the jury shall be re-examined by another Court of the United States.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>8th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>9th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>10th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Powers not delegated to the U.S. by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.&#8221;</em></p>
<h2>And subsequent amendments&#8230;</h2>
<p><strong>11th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Judicial power of the U.S. shall not extend to any suit prosecuted against one state by another state, or by citizens of a foreign state.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>12th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;States shall each have ballots for pres. &amp; vice-pres.  States certify results &amp; send to Congress. Ties sorted out by quorum in Senate.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>13th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Slavery is bad except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party was duly convicted.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>14th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Citizen = born or naturalized in U.S. Due process. Equal protection. Reps based on state pop. Traitors can&#8217;t hold office. Debt 4 war = okay.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>15th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Right of citizens to vote shall not be abridged based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>16th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes w/o apportionment among the states, and w/o regard to any census.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>17th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;2 senators from each state elected for 6 yr. terms. Temporary appointments by state governors used to fill vacancies.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>18th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;The manufacture, sale, import, export, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within the U.S. for beverage purposes is prohibited.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>19th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;The right of the citizens of the U.S. to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>20th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Term of president ends @ noon 01/20. Terms of reps &amp; sens ends @ noon 01/03. If new pres dies before start of term, vice-pres takes office.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>21st Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;The 18th Amendment was a bad idea and is hereby repealed.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>22nd Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;A person can&#8217;t be elected president more than twice. Can serve max of 2 terms + 2 yrs. of a term in which one wasn&#8217;t actually elected.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>23rd Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;D.C. is the seat of the federal gov&#8217;t. Residents get to vote, but not enjoy the rights of a state.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>24th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;The right of citizens of the U.S. to vote shall not be abridge because of failure to pay taxes.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>25th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;If pres can&#8217;t fulfill term, VP becomes pres.  Speaker and Pres pro tempore of Senate can declare pres unfit.  2/3 congress must concur.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>26th Amendment</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;No law, varying the comp for the services of the Sens and Reps, shall take effect, until an election of Reps shall have intervened.&#8221;</em></p>
<h4><strong>DISCLAIMER: I did not go to law school and make no claims of being a constitutional scholar. Modifications to the above are welcome.</strong></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/737/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visualizing the Tools of New Media to Listen, Learn, and Share</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/750</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/750#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Political Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Press coverage for social media tools like Facebook and Twitter have become deafening. Each has been around for several years, but the stars finally aligned with the convergence of new media, the 2008 election, pop culture, mobile technology, politics, and the ubiquity of high speed internet connections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the last six months, press coverage for social media tools like Facebook and Twitter have become deafening. Each has been around for several years, but the stars finally aligned with the convergence of new media, the 2008 election, pop culture, mobile technology, politics, and the ubiquity of high speed internet connections.</p>
<p>Last week the California Republican Party held a &#8220;Technology Summit&#8221; that represented what I hope is the first of many conversations about the role of technology in campaigns, party building, GOTV efforts, fundraising, and communication. I was asked to speak for a few minutes and used the time to help the audience viualize the difference between the &#8220;web 1.0&#8243; and &#8220;web 2.0&#8243;. As a student of new media who actively learns about and embraces new technology, I realize we are already taking our first significant steps in the the era of &#8220;web 3.0&#8243;. However, in the world of Republican politics&#8230; first things first.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scottgraves.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/tech_04.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-751" title="tech_04" src="http://www.scottgraves.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/tech_04-300x225.jpg" alt="tech_04" width="300" height="225" /></a>My brief talk included two slides (left and below). The first slide highlights the overlapping and interdependent nature of web 2.0&#8217;s tools of communication. It contrasts those tools with traditional media tools like television, radio, and direct mail.</p>
<p>The second slide built upon an understanding that numerous communications tools are now available &#8212; none a silver bullet &#8212; that allow organizations like political parties to impact the national dialogue. Not long ago, producers, editors, and publishers were the gatekeepers to traditional media. They determined who received the coverage&#8230; how much, and how fair. Today, organizations have options. They can use tactics that embrace the MSM to reach large audiences while also deploying tactics that focus on narrow slivers of new media niches made possible by the wonderful convergence of technology and politics.</p>
<p>I am constantly looking for better ways to communicate the relationship of new media tools to those who are just now dipping their toes in the water. Fortunately, I <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/s/#6NEdnK/www.flickr.com/photos/briansolis/2735401175/sizes/l/">StumbledUpon</a> the featured image in this post. I like it because it is clear, comprehensive, and easy to understand. I hope these visuals are helpful.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scottgraves.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/tech_06.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-752" title="tech_06" src="http://www.scottgraves.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/tech_06-300x225.jpg" alt="tech_06" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/750/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TWITTER: Choosing the #RIGHT Hashtag for Your Conservative Tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Political Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#RIGHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#TCOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hashtag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hashtags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Seacrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is broad and inclusive. It is highly intuitive. It is not tied to a party or personality. It is not likely to be co-opted or commercialized. Most importantly, it clearly and concisely states to Twitter pros and newbies alike, the nature of the content with which it is associated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not particularly new to <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> and used it extensively during my tenure as Editor-in-Chief of Red County (<a href="http://www.redcounty.com">www.redcounty.com</a>). I don&#8217;t claim to have been there from the start. I use it. I like it. It is an easy way for me to participate in the discussion of political news and commentary.</p>
<p>While at Red County, we would use the service to stream editorial content from the contributors of our 30+ blog communities. I would often augment the feed with personal comments to keep things a bit more interesting. Unfortunately, unlike my close personal friends, <a href="http://twitter.com/aplusk">@aplusk</a> (1,825,141), <a href="http://twitter.com/ryanseacrest">@ryanseacrest</a> (1,037,533), and <a href="http://twitter.com/oprah">@oprah</a> (1,019,191), our followers numbered in the thousands, not millions. Regardless, Twitter was a very valuable tool in our new media toolbox.</p>
<h2>The Proliferation of Hashtags</h2>
<p>There are thousands of hashtags, each of which help to better define a tweet and the intended audience of that tweet. According to the Twitter Fan Wiki site, hashtags were popularized during the San Diego forest fires in 2007 when <a href="http://blog.perfectspace.com/">Nate Ritter</a> used the hashtag &#8220;#sandiegofire&#8221; to identify his updates related to the disaster. My first recollection of using hastags in a meaningful way for political purposes was during last year&#8217;s #DONTGO movement (<a href="http://www.dontgomovement.com/">www.dontgomovement.com</a>), during which the #DONTGO hashtag was used to focus public attention on leaders of the U.S. Congress who preferred to adjourn for recess rather than finish working on important energy legislation. Use of that specific hashtag has diminished, but it spawned a movement and it did engage new activists.</p>
<p>Since then, those who participate in political discussions on Twitter have many hashtags from which to choose. #POLITICS is the most broad. Other examples include #TEAPARTY (discussion about the Tea Party movement), #HHRS (Hugh Hewitt Radio Show), #ICON (independent conservative). However, one of the most prevalent in conservative circles seems to be #TCOT (Top Conservatives on Twitter). While not particularly intuitive, its growth seems to coincide with conservatives flocking to new media in the wake of the 2008 election.</p>
<p>There seems to be some dispute over who started #TCOT, but it was made popular through the efforts of Rob Neppell (<a href="http://twitter.com/rneppell">@rneppell</a>), founder of <a href="http://truthlaidbear.com">The Truth Laid Bear</a> and proprietor of Kithbridge. Rob is ubiquitous in conservative new media circles and he deserves a ton of credit for helping the political Right embrace new media.</p>
<p>Like most things in new media, that which gains traction and becomes moderately successful is quickly spoiled by the mad rush of spammers, self-promoters, and profiteers to get onboard the next big thing. In my opinion, #TCOT is suffering from this phenomenon and its relevance is slowly being diminished.</p>
<h2>#RIGHT: Inclusive &amp; Intuitive</h2>
<p>My frustration with #TCOT led to my suggestion to friends that #RIGHT would be an outstanding alternative. <em><strong>It is broad and inclusive. It is highly intuitive. It is not tied to a party or personality. It is not likely to be co-opted or commercialized. Most importantly, it clearly and concisely states to Twitter pros and newbies alike, the nature of the content with which it is associated.</strong></em></p>
<p>Of course, this is not a competition. I am simply advocating on behalf of one hashtag over another for the reasons cited above. People can use Twitter however they like, write whatever they want, and tag their tweets however they feel is the most appropriate. As I write this, the Obama administration is still focused on taking over the auto and financial industries. Until their mission is accomplished and they have time to turn their attention to Twitter, the service should remain a fairly pure example of a free marketplace. Good ideas will rise to the top. Weak ideas will not.</p>
<p>I would welcome your thoughts on the matter, either here or via a Twitter discussion. Feel free to follow me at <a href="http://twitter.com/scottwgraves">@scottwgraves</a>. For more information about Twitter and hashtags, visit the Twitter Fan Wiki page <a href="http://twitter.pbworks.com/Hashtags">here</a>. For a definition of specific Twitter hashtags, or to establish a new one, visit, <a href="http://tagal.us/">@tagalus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/720/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiptoeing into New Media</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/695</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/695#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heritage foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Political Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While preparing a recent presentation titled, "New Media Tools &#038; Tactics" that was delivered at the Heritage Foundation's annual Resource Bank, I decided to leave the audience a handout with a list of action items. The goal was to offer specific advice about what an individual (on behalf of their organization) could do today, this week, this month, and long term to become more savvy in the tools of digital media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am often asked by folks involved with non-profits and political organizations about how they can take their first steps into understanding communication in the age of digital media. My answer is&#8230; &#8220;It depends.&#8221;</p>
<p>For organizations wanting to tiptoe into the tools and tactics of digital media, it is important to make an accurate assessment of the starting point. Where is the organization relative to its competition and its industry? Who is the audience? What tools do they use? What kind of resources (time, human, and money) are available for digital media? Is the organization resistant to change? Who within the organization will advocate on behalf of adopting new technology? Does that individual have the ear and respect of the executive management team?</p>
<p><strong>Early on in the process, there are more questions than answers.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-710" title="newmedia" src="http://www.scottgraves.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/newmedia.jpg" alt="newmedia" width="300" height="225" />While preparing a recent presentation titled, &#8220;New Media Tools &amp; Tactics&#8221; that was delivered at the Heritage Foundation&#8217;s annual Resource Bank, I decided to leave the audience a handout with a list of action items. The goal was to offer specific advice about what an individual, on behalf of their organization, could do today, this week, this month, and long term to become more savvy in the tools of digital media.</p>
<p>Outlined is that list of key action items. Some are very basic. Some require careful consideration. For those who are already comfortable with tools like Facebook and Twitter, skip down to items that are more relevant to you and your organization.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<h2><strong>ACTION ITEMS</strong><strong></strong></h2>
<p><strong><br />
TODAY</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Setup a Facebook account
<ul>
<li> Establish at least 300 &#8220;friends&#8221;</li>
<li> Join various political Facebook groups and causes</li>
<li> GET INVOLVED</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li> Setup a Twitter account
<ul>
<li> Follow at least 1,000 like-minded political activists</li>
<li> Use #TCOT (www.topconservativesontwitter.org)</li>
<li> Send Tweets and reply to others</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li> Learn about YouTube</li>
<li> Create a checklist of all channels through which your message is delivered</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><br />
THIS WEEK</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Identify a tech leader/advisor for your organization</li>
<li> Create a checklist of all channels through which your message is delivered</li>
<li> Ask your kids about the appeal of text messaging</li>
<li> Do a Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.com) search on the terms found in this presentation.</li>
<li> Read Online Politics 101 at www.epolitics.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><br />
THIS MONTH</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Reach out to influential online journalists and bloggers</li>
<li> Identify individuals to write fresh, newsworthy content on behalf of your organization</li>
<li> Identify a technology advocate within your organization</li>
<li> Conduct a tech audit
<ul>
<li> Website (features, functionality, content, and design)</li>
<li> E-Mail (size, relevance, and list management software)</li>
<li> Survey your audience</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li> Get a smartphone (iPhone, Blackberry, etc.)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><br />
LONG TERM</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Embrace change (Like politics, technology is highly dynamic)</li>
<li> Give tech leader a seat at the table</li>
<li> Allocate more funding to technology</li>
<li> Commit to continuing education</li>
<li> Hire tech-savvy staff</li>
<li> Experiment (adopt new technologies)</li>
<li> Pay attention to new trends</li>
<li> Take action!</li>
</ul>
<p>You can download a complete PDF version of the handout <a href="http://www.scottgraves.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/handout.pdf">here</a>. Let me know if you have any questions. Special thanks to Nicole Williams from the <a href="http://www.spn.org">State Policy Network</a> and David Kralik from <a href="http://www.americansolutions.org">American Solutions</a> for their feedback and insight. I am available for presentations to your organizations about the benefits of adopting the tools and tactics of digital media. Please contact me at <a href="mailto:scott@scottgraves.com">scott@scottgraves.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/695/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Mania</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/655</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/655#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="300" height="243" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/PN2HAroA12w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PN2HAroA12w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/655/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TWITTER: What You Need to Know</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/493</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/493#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Media & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgraves.com/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of my colleagues say, "What took you so long to get on Twitter. It's only the hottest social networking tool out there!" For the rest of you, you're probably thinking, "What the hell is Twitter?"

I was in the latter category about four months ago. Now I am kicking myself for taking so long to get on board. With the encouragement of Hugh Hewitt and a few of my blogger associates, I was convinced. Twitter is a key component in the integration of blogging, social networking, new media, and instant messaging.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="300" height="250" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/ddO9idmax0o&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ddO9idmax0o&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottgraves.com/archives/493/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
